|
Welcome to Warships Magazine
|
POLITICIANS WHO REMOVE LAYERS OF NAVAL DETERRENCE PUT THE WORLD IN PERIL |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 02 May 2012 07:45 |
|
Commentary - Odin’s Eye

Two cases illustrate the old maxim of ‘act in haste, repent at leisure’. One is the fashion in which since the 1982 Falklands War the British have shed most of their maritime defence layers. It has left their nation with a malformed naval structure that on its own can obliterate the planet but (again on its own) deters very few potential foes, if any. As we consider in this edition, Prime Minister David Cameron spoke recently about the future Royal Navy having a huge punch, in one stroke revealing his critical failure to understand the nature of deploying sea power, which is not solely about hitting power. It is as much about deterring an enemy with presence and passive coercion, preventing wars from starting in the first place, than laying waste to places via strikes from the sea. Our second case concerns the Congress of the USA, which has been criticised by Leon Panetta, the civilian boss of the Pentagon, for placing a gun at the head of the American nation. Having devised a carefully constructed money-saving defence review, which preserved the maritime forces so crucial to countering future global threats, the US Department of Defense now finds the politicians are squabbling over where and what level of cuts should be approved (more trimming in Defense or Welfare?).
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 02 May 2012 07:54 |
|
Read more...
|
|
|
News Digest from the May 2012 Edition |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 02 May 2012 07:55 |
|
Reports by Usman Ansari
- BIG EXERCISES IN YELLOW SEA
- KASHIN TO SYRIA
- INDIA’S LOCALISED SUBS
- AIR WING RETAINED
- DARING WITH CVNs
- SIXTH ISRAELI SUBMARINE
|
|
Read more...
|
|
News Digest from the April 2012 Edition |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 04 April 2012 09:48 |
|
Reports by Usman Ansari, Michael Nitz, Santiago Rivas, Juan Carlos Cicalesi & Charles Strathdee
- ERA OF THE TYPHOON MONSTER BOAT IS OVER
- WAS SSBN ARMED WITH NUKES DURING FIRE?
- NEW ISRAELI SUB
- FUTURE BRAZILIAN CARRIER
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
WILL A ‘NEW COLD WAR’ SEE THE WORLD GO ‘MAD’? |
|
|
|
|
Wednesday, 04 April 2012 09:44 |
|
by Dr Dave Sloggett

During the Cold War rational actors prevailed. In the Cuban Missile Crisis of late 1962 the world stood on the edge of an apocalypse, yet President Jack Kennedy and Chairman Nikita Khrushchev recognised nuclear war was not, in the end, an option. For the sake of all Mankind they stepped back from the brink. Today, almost exactly half a century on, as the world faces the prospect of a nuclear-armed Iran, the images and rhetoric of the Cold War are resurfacing. British Foreign Secretary William Hague has gone on the record to draw a comparison between the Cold War and a world coming to terms with a nuclear-armed Iran. This was not a matter of political hubris.
|
|
Last Updated on Wednesday, 04 April 2012 09:53 |
|
Read more...
|
|
Wednesday, 04 April 2012 09:32 |
|
Commentary - Odin’s Eye
The Strategic Defence Review (SDR) in 1998 committed Britain to an expeditionary strategy, which included replacement of three Invincible Class aircraft-carrying ships with two larger, more versatile, carriers. Shortly afterwards Britain joined the Joint Strike Fighter (JSF) programme, which had emerged from something called the Common Affordable Lightweight Fighter (CALF). The British bought their way into the JSF development programme as one of the founding partners. The JSF was intended to produce a replacement aircraft for the USAF, US Navy, US Marine Corps, the Royal Navy and RAF. Many more countries would join the programme and eventually thousands of JSFs would be built, making it a cheap, mass-production aircraft.
|
|
Read more...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Page 1 of 5 |
Copyright © 2012 Warships Magazine. All Rights Reserved.
|
|
Who's Online
We have 36 guests online
|